GE Aerospace’s impressive rally since its spin-off from General Electric has captured investor enthusiasm; shares are up more than 90% year to date, but the stock’s altitude — it’s trading at a premium of 15%-40% above its own five-year average valuation multiple, depending on the metric one uses — may be unsustainable. Despite the company’s dominant position in commercial aviation engines, several concerning factors suggest potential downside risks. Weakening consumer spending could reduce airline profitability and slow aircraft orders. Airlines may defer new deliveries or maintenance spending during downturns, which can directly impact GE Aerospace’s revenue streams. The company’s heavy exposure to commercial aviation — approximately 70% of revenue — creates cyclical vulnerability that investors may be underestimating. Pratt & Whitney’s issues with its geared turbofan engine temporarily benefited GE, but this advantage won’t last forever. As competitors resolve technical issues and new entrants pursue next-generation propulsion technologies, GE faces mounting pressure to invest heavily in R & D while maintaining its recent well-above-average margins. For perspective, GE’s adjusted net income margins were over 15% for the twelve months ended Sept. 30. This is well above the 20-year average margin, yet investors are pricing in further margin expansion. Street estimates optimistically assume margins could grow to over 17% by FY2028. Regulatory agencies worldwide are increasing scrutiny of engine maintenance requirements, potentially mandating more frequent inspections that could ground aircraft and reduce flying hours. While this might boost short-term aftermarket revenue, it risks damaging customer relationships and could accelerate the adoption of competing engine platforms on future aircraft orders. These reasons alone might be sufficient for those who hold the shares to consider taking profits or selling some of the upside option premium, anticipating that additional upside in the near term is unlikely. However, there are other, more recent reasons to be cautious. The tragic loss of a Honolulu-bound UPS MD-11F in Louisville, Kentucky, may also potentially weigh on some of the companies involved. It should be said that the NTSB — the National Transportation Safety Board, which is investigating the cause(s) of the crash — takes a very deliberate approach. Although there have been several public briefings, and the NTSB will likely issue a preliminary report within 30 days, investigations of this type typically take 18 to 24 months. Here is what we do know so far. Thirty-seven seconds after the pilots called out “takeoff thrust,” the CVR (cockpit voice recorder) recorded audible warnings in the form of a repeated bell and an audible warning “engine one fire”. Unfortunately, this took place after V1. In aviation, V1 is the “commit to fly” decision speed, meaning the pilots cannot reject the takeoff. Video of the takeoff roll confirms a fire on the left wing. The video further confirms that the left engine (engine #1) departed the aircraft before the crash. Photographic evidence shows engine #1 and most of the pylon — the components that mount the engine to the wing of the aircraft — next to the runway, and the NTSB confirmed this during the third press conference. The MD-11F can fly on only two engines; however, compounding the problem, the video suggests that debris from engine 1’s departure from the wing, and possibly the wing fire itself, induced a compressor stall on at least one of the remaining engines, as characteristic pops of flame can be seen, suggesting that the pilots did not have full power available from the remaining engines. The press conferences emphasized that the NTSB is combing the sides of Runway 17R at Louisville, looking for additional engine debris. It appears that the CF6-80CSD1F engines, manufactured by General Electric, are in the spotlight (note that commonly GE CF6 engines also include components manufactured by other aerospace companies, including MTU, Safran, and Howmet). I am not suggesting that GE or any one of the manufacturers is responsible for the crash. Assuming the cause can be determined, it will ultimately be revealed by the NTSB investigation; however, it is reasonable for an investor to assume that uncertainty could weigh on the share price, which is already fully priced. GE Aerospace hit an all-time closing high of $314.28 on Oct. 29. A trader who believes this could represent an intermediate top could sell the January 310/330 call spread for approximately $8, 40% of the $20 difference between the strikes. The upside breakeven of approximately $318 exceeds the all-time highs. This is a trade that can be executed either as a standalone neutral to bearish trade or, potentially, as an overwrite against a long GE stock position to collect ~2.6% in options premium over the next couple of months — a standstill yield of ~13.95% annualized. DISCLOSURES: None All opinions expressed by the CNBC Pro contributors are solely their opinions and do not reflect the opinions of CNBC, NBC UNIVERSAL, their parent company or affiliates, and may have been previously disseminated by them on television, radio, internet or another medium. THE ABOVE CONTENT IS SUBJECT TO OUR TERMS AND CONDITIONS AND PRIVACY POLICY . THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY AND DOES NOT CONSITUTE FINANCIAL, INVESTMENT, TAX OR LEGAL ADVICE OR A RECOMMENDATION TO BUY ANY SECURITY OR OTHER FINANCIAL ASSET. THE CONTENT IS GENERAL IN NATURE AND DOES NOT REFLECT ANY INDIVIDUAL’S UNIQUE PERSONAL CIRCUMSTANCES. THE ABOVE CONTENT MIGHT NOT BE SUITABLE FOR YOUR PARTICULAR CIRCUMSTANCES. BEFORE MAKING ANY FINANCIAL DECISIONS, YOU SHOULD STRONGLY CONSIDER SEEKING ADVICE FROM YOUR OWN FINANCIAL OR INVESTMENT ADVISOR. Click here for the full disclaimer.
