The National Electoral Institute (INE) on Monday delivered its documentation to the five members of the new court of judicial discipline, to the two new members of the Superior Chamber of the Electoral Court of the Judicial Power of the Federation (TEPJF) and the 15 of the five regional rooms of the TEPJF, after the results of the unprecedented election last June 1, despite the low participation and voting guides.
The General Council of the INE approved by majority the validity of these three judicial elections, despite the irregularities detected that compromised the free vote and coincidences of the voting with the “accordions” (voting guides) that gave meaning to the votes of the citizenship.
Intense debate and guides
After an intense debate like Sunday, when he delivered the majority records to the new ministers of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN), the INE declared the validity of the election.
In the vote, the counselors Dania Ravel and Claudia Zavala and the counselors Arturo Castillo, Martín Faz and Jaime Rivera, voted against the validity of the results as happened in the case of the SCJN on Sunday, while in favor the Guadalupe Taddei, president of the INE, as well as UUC-Kib Espadas, Norma de la Cruz, Jorge Montaño, Jorge Montaño, Jorge Montaño. Humphrey.
In his speech, Faz said that in the case of the election for the Court of Judicial Discipline, the effect was “even more serious than for the Supreme Court.”
Lee: INE Valida Triunfo de Minisros de la SCJN, despite the lack of consensus
“The existence of 43,231 boxes is noticed, that is, 51.55% of the total computed boxes, where the five candidacies for the court of judicial discipline that appeared in the multicited accordion were absolute winners,” said Faz.
He said that at the subnational level it was observed that this behavior was reproduced in “100% of the states and pointed out that” for implausible that seems, in 90.39% of the boxes obtained the majority of votes between three and five candidates of said accordion. “
Regarding the top room of the TEPJF there were 48,683 boxes, this is 57.77% of the total “where the two candidacies for the Superior Chamber were absolute in the accordion”,
While at the subnational level the behavior was reproduced in 29 federative entities, “that is, in 90% of the states, the ‘accordion’ obtained an absolute triumph for the formation of this court.”
Points to test for cancellation
In an interview with some media, the counselor Carla Humphrey explained that to invalidate the result of the electoral process, the illegitimacy must be proven “completely”, which must be “systematic and repeated.”
The five winning candidates who were elected to hold the position of magistrates of the Court of Judicial Discipline were Cecilia Maya, Bernardo Bátiz, Verónica de Gyvez, Rufino León Tovar, as well as Indira Isabel García Pérez.
While the two winners of the TEPJF Superior Room were Gilberto de Guzmán Bátiz and Claudia Valle, who won the election and received their constancy.
In the act highlighted the delivery of the document to Roselia Bustillo Marín, indigenous with the highest vote to be a magistrate in the city of Xalapa, state of Veracruz, within the regional halls of the TEPJF, who added 1.11 million votes.
Lee: questionable profiles are imposed on the unprecedented judicial election
On Sunday, the INE delivered the records of majority of votes to the new Ministers of the SCJN to prove the triumph of the nine elected ministers, including the new president, Mixteco lawyer Hugo Aguilar Ortiz, the first indigenous to reach the High Court and who will preside over the Supreme during the first two years, starting next September 1.
This election, derived from a constitutional reform promoted by President Andrés Manuel López Obrador (2018-2024), with the support of the current president, Claudia Sheinbaum, among other points, reduces from 11 to nine the ministers of the Supreme
With EFE information
Inspy, discover and share. Follow us and find what you are looking for on our Instagram!
