On Tuesday, a judge prevented the military from fulfilling an executive order signed by President Donald Trump that sought to prohibit transgender people in the United States Army, which is the last legal blow for Trump for their executive orders.
Key data
The federal district judge Ana Reyes granted a preliminary judicial order to the transgender plaintiffs who sued the Government for Trump’s executive order in a 79 -page ruling on Tuesday, saying that the plaintiffs and any other transgender military member would be “subject to irreparable damage” if a court order was not granted.
The ruling was in response to a demand for an executive order that Trump signed on January 27 that established that “the adoption of an inconsistent gender identity with the sex of an individual conflicts with the commitment of a soldier with an honorable, truthful and disciplined lifestyle, even in his personal life.”
Reyes said the sentence will be suspended until Friday “to give time to the defendants to consider presenting an emergency suspension before the DC circuit court.”
Cita Crucial
“The service records of the plaintiffs alone constitute the proof that transgender people can have warrior ethics, physical and mental health, altruism, honor, integrity and discipline necessary to guarantee military excellence,” Reyes wrote in their ruling. “So, why license them and other decorated soldiers? The defendants have not answered this key question.”
What to pay attention to
Trump’s response to the sentence. He had not publicly pronounced on the precautionary measure until 19:25 EDT.
Key history
Trump signed the order a few days after assuming the position in January, and the Secretary of Defense, Pete Hegseth, announced a policy aligned with the order in early February. Demand, Talbott v. Trump was presented a day after Trump signed the order, on behalf of six active service members and two people tried to enlist in the army. Since it was filed, 12 more plaintiffs have joined, according to Glaad Law, a legal defense group for transgender people who helped file the lawsuit. Reyes had previously indicated that the court order would grant. During a hearing on March 12, he questioned the government lawyers about the proposed prohibition, saying that the data of the reports cited when the ban were issued were outdated, the Department of Defense “carefully selected the data” and took conclusions that were “total and rudely misleading,” The New York Times reported.
Large number
15,500. That is the number of transgender people who served in the Army in 2014, according to an estimate of the Williams Center of the UCLA Law Faculty, which studies sexual orientation and gender identity. The Defense Department has a significantly lower current figure, close to 4,200 people, according to the Times.
This article was originally published by Forbes Us.
You may be interested: a recession in Mexico will depend on what EU and other countries do: Ebrard
