The appearance of a 3D manufactured firearm in the murder of Brian Thompson, the CEO of the world’s largest medical insurer, at the hands of Luigi Mangione shook the debate on gun control.
At the scene, police recovered a ghost gun, a weapon with no serial number and virtually undetectable.
For the community of homemade weapons enthusiasts, this weapon, identified as a Chairmanwon V1, a variant of the popular FMDA 19.2, is a clear example of the sophistication and danger achieved by these homemade weapons.
The FMDA 19.2, a relatively old but widely known and tested design, has served as the basis for numerous modifications, such as the Chairmanwon V1.
Its popularity is due in large part to its reliability and ease of manufacture. Although Mangione’s design has some peculiarities, the essence of FMDA 19.2 is unmistakable.
Read: Biden promotes new global strategy to confront Russia, Iran, Korea and China before Trump’s term
Mangione’s case has raised concerns about the ease with which lethal firearms can be manufactured using 3D printing technology.
Cody Wilson, a pioneer in the field of 3D printed weapons, stressed that technology has advanced significantly, allowing the creation of increasingly durable and functional weapons.
Ghost guns, made with a combination of commercial parts and 3D printed components, represent an unprecedented challenge for law enforcement. Having no serial numbers and being easily customizable, these weapons are difficult to trace and make it difficult to investigate. crimes.
The murder of Thompson, head of UnitedHealthcare, has revealed the connection between 3D printed weapons and certain ideological movements. Groups like Deterrence Dispensed, which promote the manufacture of homemade weapons, see these technologies as a way to defend individual freedom. However, the use of these weapons in violent acts raises serious questions about the ethical and social implications of this trend.
Follow us on Google News to always stay informed
