The EU prepares to respond to Trump’s Greenland tariffs

If economic sanctions are designed to apply pressure without firing a shot, then U.S. President Donald Trump has aimed directly at America’s closest military allies.

Trump said Saturday the U.S. will impose a 10% tariff on imports from eight NATO nations — Denmark, Norway, Sweden, France, Germany, the United Kingdom, the Netherlands and Finland — starting Feb. 1.

Trump added that duties on those nations would rise to 25% on June 1 until “a Deal is reached for the Complete and Total purchase of Greenland.”

European leaders moved quickly to condemn the move, calling it “unacceptable.” After a meeting Sunday and broadly agreeing to dissuade Trump, EU officials are weighing retaliatory tariffs of as much as 93 billion euros ($108 billion) on U.S. goods, reported Reuters.

U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is set to address the Greenland-related tariffs in a speech later Monday, London time.

Beyond the immediate political fallout, the move threatens to derail the EU-U.S. trade agreement reached in August and risks the prospect of retaliation from Europe.

Duties slapped on European nations “could likely mean a significant E.U. pushback, where the E.U. could respond in kind, leading to a sort of trade war with the U.S.,” Dan Alamariu, chief geopolitical strategist at Alpine Macro, told CNBC over email before Trump announced the latest tariffs.

Until now, markets had largely taken geopolitical tensions in stride. Equity markets entered the year higher because disputes involving Greenland, Iran or Venezuela had not yet pulled in major economies or military partners, said Eric Freedman, chief investment officer for Chicago-based Northern Trust Wealth Management, last week.

That calculus may be changing. By drawing European allies into the dispute, the tariffs increase the risk of greater market volatility. Major U.S. indexes were in the red for the week even before Trump’s Greenland-related tariffs, signaling growing unease among investors.

All of this unfolds as the World Economic Forum begins today, Jan. 19, at Davos. World leaders will convene for talks on trade, security and geopolitical tensions, with Trump in attendance — and set to come face to face with leaders of several countries now in his tariff crosshairs.

Just barely four weeks into the year, and fault lines are already building. What emerges from the snowy peaks will, like an avalanche, have a disproportionate impact on those below.

— CNBC’s Holly Ellyatt, Chloe Taylor and Lee Ying Shan contributed to this report.

China’s economic growth slows. Fourth-quarter growth came in at 4.5%, the weakest pace in nearly three years. However, economic output for the whole of 2025 was 5%, meeting Beijing’s target of “around 5%.”

‘Very unlikely’ for Supreme Court to overturn tariffs: Bessent. “I believe that the Supreme Court does not want to create chaos,” Bessent said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press.” On Greenland tariffs, Bessent said they are a response to an emergency.

U.S.-Taiwan deal unlikely to shift balance. Analysts say expanded chip manufacturing in the U.S. will not significantly reduce Washington’s reliance on Taiwan’s production through the end of the decade.

Major U.S. indexes were mostly flat. The Dow Jones Industrial Average, however, fell 0.17% on Friday. Asia-Pacific markets fell Monday. Hong Kong’s Hang Seng Index fell 1% on the release of mainland China economic data, but South Korea’s Kospi bucked the trend to rise.

[PRO] Best-performing hedge funds in 2025. An annual ranking of hedge funds revealed that the industry reaped its largest-ever dollar gain last year, led by a single fund that delivered $18.9 billion to investors in 2025.

Global week ahead: Hopes that cooler heads can prevail in Davos

Over the years, I have seen many versions of Davos: the fall-out from the Great Financial Crisis and European debt crunch; the trading scandal that rocked French banking giant Societe Generale; the spread of the Covid-19 epidemic and now the upending of the world order that has been in place since the end of the Second World War.

Everyone has an opinion about this meeting, but one thing is true — it is never dull. And 2026 will certainly be no different. The tension between countries that call themselves allies is palpable going into this meeting.

— Leonie Kidd